On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:11:58AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > It's also somewhat a matter of *taste* (and hence subjective), if you > _still_ don't get it, Matthew, then there's no point continuing this thread > and trying to convince you ad infinitum. Right. It's a matter of taste. What makes you think you have taste? I don't think that the module solution is perfect. But abusing the module parameters is a worse idea. sysfs just isn't a good fit for this, according to my taste. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- References:
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Benjamin LaHaise <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- Prev by Date: Re: This kernel requires the following features not present on the CPU... (on a VIA C7 CPU)
- Next by Date: Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- Previous by thread: Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- Next by thread: Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- Index(es):
 |