On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:17:40AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > However, Ben does have a point that we shouldn't force those > using SCSI (and wishing to use the new async scanning > feature) to depend on and use sysfs too yes, we do. an no, procfs is a much worse filesystem to depend on for drivers. if people don't want sysfs they can either do the synchronous scan or do their own scan in userspace. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- References:
- Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Simon Arlott <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Asynchronous scsi scanning
- Prev by Date: Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86 new setup: use appropriate sections for code and data
- Previous by thread: Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- Next by thread: Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- Index(es):
 |