On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:34:40AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > Hmmm, actually those other users could easily write and maintain > a 20-line patch that does the wait for async scans thing for them > using /proc/scsi/scsi in any case. How about the three users who're bothered by this extra module being built maintain a one-line patch to Kconfig and leave well enough alone? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Benjamin LaHaise <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- References:
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- Prev by Date: Re: [Patch] Allocate sparsemem memmap above 4G on X86_64
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Mark page cache pages as __GFP_PAGECACHE instead of __GFP_MOVABLE
- Previous by thread: Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- Next by thread: Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- Index(es):
 |