Am 16.05.2007 03:39 schrieb Satyam Sharma: ["default n" for menuconfig] > these problems would occur only the _first_ time someone > transitions from the old .config's to the new scheme. But those > "default y"s for all the various "configmenu"s (let's please call > them that) that got introduced in the Kconfig files would cause > unnecessary annoyance to users of make oldconfig _for ever_. I'm not sure I'm following you. Where would that annoyance occur? On subsequent uses of "make oldconfig" the default shouldn't even matter, as the previous choice would just silently be kept. -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: [email protected] Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc1
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc1
- References:
- Linux 2.6.22-rc1
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc1
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc1
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc1
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc1
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc1
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc1
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc1
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Linux 2.6.22-rc1
- Prev by Date: [Patch -mm] Driver core: coding style cleanup
- Next by Date: Re: [2.6.21.1] OOPS in timer stats code
- Previous by thread: Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc1
- Next by thread: Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc1
- Index(es):
 |