Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]> writes: > No, David means that "asm volatile (...)" is meaningful and OK to use. Ok, I mistook that. -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC, PATCH 2/4] SoC base drivers: ASIC3 SoC hardware definitions
- From: Paul Sokolovsky <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC, PATCH 2/4] SoC base drivers: ASIC3 SoC hardware definitions
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil
- From: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil
- From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- [RFC, PATCH 2/4] SoC base drivers: ASIC3 SoC hardware definitions
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Restructuring hpet timer generic clock interfaces
- Next by Date: [patch 0/4] A series of cleanup patches
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil
- Index(es):
 |