Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 8 May 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:

> [well, can be turned into a patch]
> 
> Here are some 'volatile' comments from Linus, extracted from
> several emails in at least 2 threads.
> 
> If this is close to useful, we can add it to Documentation/.
> 
> ===============================================================
> 
> ***** "volatile" considered useless and evil:  Just Say NO! *****
> 
> Do not use the C-language "volatile" keyword
> (extracted from lkml emails from Linus)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 

Since 'volatile' has two different semantics depending on the context in 
which it is used, this warning should be appended to include the fact that 
it is legitimate to use for inline assembly.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux