On 5/6/07, Wim Van Sebroeck <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Dan,
> >Could you split this patch into 2 patches: one that deals with the moving
> >of
> >the architecture dependant code (and explaining why) and one with the new
> >watchdog drivers? I will continue my review today.
> >
>
> I am one of the maintainers of this architecture, (Lennert Buytenhek
> is the other). I will go ahead and split this up so you can sign-off
> on the watchdog specific bits. The intent is to move all hardware
> definitions under #include <asm/hardware.h>. You are right this
> should have been a separate patch.
I reviewed the rest of the code. Looks OK to me. One small remark though:
Can we change the ifdef's in the code as described in section 2 point 2 of
the Documentation/SubmittingPatches document?
Ok, I can add this cleanup.
Barring any objections I'll go ahead and submit the revised patch with
an "Acked-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim at iguana dot be>" to Russell's
ARM patch tracker.
Thanks,
Wim.
Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]