On Wednesday May 2, [email protected] wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2007, John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote:
>
> argh. the whole point of this discussion is to come to a *consensus*
> on what should be in that feature removal file. there is no point in
> creating and submitting patches, either to update that file or remove
> kernel features, until enough people *agree*.
>
> at the risk of being head-bangingly repetitive, that's what the wiki
> page is for:
>
> http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Stuff_to_be_removed
>
> go. read. comment. update. add. remove. it's a wiki. don't make
> me pull this car over and explain it. :-)
Unfortunately, this community is not founded on the concept of
'wiki'. It is founded on the concept of 'email'. That is were most
discussions happen.
So if you want to start a discussion (and your topic certainly seems
relevant) I suspect you will get more participation if you keep it in
the mailing list.
So post a list of features that are apparently due for removal and ask
"can I actually get rid of these" (or whatever you want to ask). and
then base on the response, do something else, maybe a revised list,
maybe a patch, maybe send it again in CAPITALS because nobody notice
when it was in lower-case :-)
Wiki's certainly have there place, but I don't think this is it.
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
