Re: so ... what *are* candidates for removal?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robert P. J. Day wrote:
  at the risk of spawning yet another thread and another flamefest,
what *are* the kernel features that should be considered candidates
for removal, either now or at some point in the future.

  please, no discussions about mechanisms or kernel warnings or the
like -- just the features whose value is nearing their end.  i'll even
volunteer to collect all that info and summarize it here:

http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Stuff_to_be_removed

because that's just the kind of guy i am, and i have the week off, and
i'm bored. :-)

rday
Already documented in the kernel tarball, see Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux