On Tue, 01 May 2007 17:30:36 +0200, Andre Tomt said: > Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Stuff_to_be_removed > Already documented in the kernel tarball, see > Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt Robert's point is that the file you cited is horrendously out of date, and we need to create a consensus of what *should* be in feature-removal-schedule.txt so we can update it to correspond to some sort of reality, or at the very least some politically correct sanitized view of reality. It currently lists stuff scheduled to be removed 18 months ago, and doesn't list stuff that everybody agrees deserves to be heaved over the side as soon as the users have had "enough warning" (whatever that means)....
Attachment:
pgpve3AV2PTP8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: so ... what *are* candidates for removal?
- From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: so ... what *are* candidates for removal?
- References:
- so ... what *are* candidates for removal?
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: so ... what *are* candidates for removal?
- From: Andre Tomt <[email protected]>
- so ... what *are* candidates for removal?
- Prev by Date: Re: [3/3] use vmalloc() to arrange guard pages for stacks
- Next by Date: Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/4] SoC base drivers
- Previous by thread: Re: so ... what *are* candidates for removal?
- Next by thread: Re: so ... what *are* candidates for removal?
- Index(es):
 |