On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 22:37 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > I'm not going to worry about going farther until the patches in flight > > settle down a little bit, but this looks promising. > > > > Is there any value in adding an "early-putchar" function pointer into > the structure somehow? I could easily arrange for the domain builder to > put a bit of code into the domain so that the early boot code can emit > something. Well there aren't that many instructions between startup_32 and lguest_init at the moment, but I guess if we end up going through bzImage decompression it makes more sense... Rusty. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- References:
- [PATCH] [0/22] x86 candidate patches for review II: 64bit relocatable kernel
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
- [PATCH] [0/22] x86 candidate patches for review II: 64bit relocatable kernel
- Prev by Date: Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.
- Next by Date: Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.
- Previous by thread: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- Next by thread: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- Index(es):
![]() |