Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> writes: > Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> I'm not going to worry about going farther until the patches in flight >> settle down a little bit, but this looks promising. >> > > Is there any value in adding an "early-putchar" function pointer into > the structure somehow? I could easily arrange for the domain builder to > put a bit of code into the domain so that the early boot code can emit > something. I don't think so. Once we know what subarch it is we can do a specific hypervisor call if we need to for early printing. There are weird issues like physical vs virtual that would seem to make anything more generic very difficult to get right, because the code pointed at would need to be fully pic. So as a trivial hypervisor call certainly, but I'm pretty doubtful about a function pointer. Then we can do: if (xen) blah else if (lguest) blah2 Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] [0/22] x86 candidate patches for review II: 64bit relocatable kernel
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
- [PATCH] [0/22] x86 candidate patches for review II: 64bit relocatable kernel
- Prev by Date: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- Next by Date: Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.
- Previous by thread: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- Next by thread: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- Index(es):
![]() |