Rusty Russell wrote: > > BTW, wrt. a new "platform type" field, should it go something like this? > > -0235/3 N/A pad2 Unused > +0235/1 2.07+ platform_type Runtime platform (see below) > +0236/2 N/A pad2 Unused > ... > + platform_type: > + For kernels which can boot on multiple platforms. Currently > + 0 == native (normal), 1 == lguest (paravirtualized). > Well, yes, but we need to think about if there is more things that should be added. There *definitely* should be space for a platform data pointer, to start out with. I would also like to see a platform data field, as well as a bootloader extension field (we're going to have that problem soon enough.) -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- References:
- [PATCH] [0/22] x86 candidate patches for review II: 64bit relocatable kernel
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] [0/22] x86 candidate patches for review II: 64bit relocatable kernel
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86_64: Reflect the relocatability of the kernel in the ELF header.
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [30/30] x86_64: Add missing !X86_PAE dependincy to the 2G/2G split.
- Previous by thread: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- Next by thread: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- Index(es):
 |