On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 21:00 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > Rusty Russell wrote: > >> It'd be nicer if there were a "struct boot_params" declaration, but we > >> can't have everything. > > > > It's in my patchset-under-development. > > > > (Preview snapshot: > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~hpa/setup-snapshot-2007.04.30.patch) > > Just pushed out a git tree: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/hpa/linux-2.6-newsetup.git;a=summary Any chance of splitting off a "struct boot_params" header (includable by non-kernel code) for inclusion immediately? The rest can wait until 2.6.23, but it'd be sweet to get this in place sooner. BTW, wrt. a new "platform type" field, should it go something like this? -0235/3 N/A pad2 Unused +0235/1 2.07+ platform_type Runtime platform (see below) +0236/2 N/A pad2 Unused ... + platform_type: + For kernels which can boot on multiple platforms. Currently + 0 == native (normal), 1 == lguest (paravirtualized). Thanks, Rusty. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- References:
- [PATCH] [0/22] x86 candidate patches for review II: 64bit relocatable kernel
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] [0/22] x86 candidate patches for review II: 64bit relocatable kernel
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] [30/30] x86_64: Add missing !X86_PAE dependincy to the 2G/2G split.
- Next by Date: [git pull] Input updates for post-2.6.21
- Previous by thread: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- Next by thread: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- Index(es):