Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: >> 2.6.21-final is fine. > > Sure, but what about 2.6.21-git3 (or, better, current -git)? OIC. Sorry for being dense. Will check. >>> If that's OK then we need to pick through the difference between >>> 2.6.21-rc7-mm2's driver tree and the patches which went into mainline. And >>> that's a pretty small set. >> I'm not quite sure how to determine that difference. Can you just provide >> me with a list of patches you'd like me to test? > > Not really - everything's tangled up. A bisection search on the > 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 driver tree would be the best bet. Ok. No prob. It'll just take a bit of time. (Compiling a kernel on that machine takes about 4 hours.) I'll be back. :-) -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: [email protected] Bonn, Germany - Undetected errors are handled as if no error occurred. (IBM) -
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- References:
- 2.6.21-rc7-mm2
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- 2.6.21-rc7-mm2
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 suspend bug. [kernel/kthread.c]
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [39/40] i386: Export paravirt_ops for non GPL modules too
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
- Index(es):
 |