Am 30.04.2007 20:21 schrieb Andrew Morton: > A lot of Greg's driver tree has gone upstream, so please check current > mainline. 2.6.21-final is fine. > If that's OK then we need to pick through the difference between > 2.6.21-rc7-mm2's driver tree and the patches which went into mainline. And > that's a pretty small set. I'm not quite sure how to determine that difference. Can you just provide me with a list of patches you'd like me to test? Thanks, Tilman -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: [email protected] Wehrhausweg 66 Fax: +49 228 4299019 53227 Bonn Germany
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
- References:
- 2.6.21-rc7-mm2
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- 2.6.21-rc7-mm2
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] support PCI MCFG space on Intel i915 bridges
- Next by Date: Re: [2/6] add config option to vmalloc stacks (was: Re: [-mm patch] i386: enable 4k stacks by default)
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
- Index(es):
 |