Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage

"H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]> writes:

> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> 
>> Sure.
>> 
>> Peter do we want to use the bootloader byte and assign lguest it's own
>> bootloader type or do we want to add another field specific to 
>> paravirtualized environments?
>> 
>
> The bootloader byte is already a bit too overused; I'm a little scared
> that we're going to run out of boot loader IDs as it is.
>
> We probably should add another field, and while we're at it maybe we
> should add a boot loader extension field.

A dedicated subarchitecture field would make sense.  One of the pieces
that would be nice is if we could detect other non paravirt
subarchitectures.

James is there a reasonable way to detect voyager at boot time?
So we could potentially have a generic kernel that can also boot on
voyager?

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] [0/22] x86 candidate patches for review II: 64bit relocatable kernel
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 08/12] i386: Convert the boot time page tables to the kernels native format.
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.21-ext4-1
• Previous by thread: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
• Next by thread: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]