Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage

Rusty Russell <[email protected]> writes:

> On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 21:38 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Rusty Russell wrote:
>> > 
>> > Dammit, Eric, you spend a lot of time using words like "insane" where
>> > you mean we didn't do everything all at once.
>> > 
>> > It's *not* clear that using %esi is sane, but nothing in the current
>> > code prevents that.
>> 
>> Why not?
>
> (I assume you mean why isn't it clear?)
>
> Because VMI uses the presence of a ROM to indicate it's not native.  KVM
> uses a magic MSR IIRC.

Reasonable, if you don't mid a little hardware emulation.

> I think it makes sense for lguest to change over, tho.  Patches welcome
> 8)

Sure.

Peter do we want to use the bootloader byte and assign lguest it's own
bootloader type or do we want to add another field specific to 
paravirtualized environments?

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] [0/22] x86 candidate patches for review II: 64bit relocatable kernel
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/5] fallocate system call
• Next by Date: Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
• Previous by thread: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
• Next by thread: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]