Johannes Berg wrote:
Judging from experience with the wext 32/64 bit fiasco it seems to be rather uncommon to use 32-bit userspace on 64-bit machines.
I disagree...it's quite common. I think its the standard way of doing things for ppc64, for instance.
Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck
- Next by Date: Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- Previous by thread: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- Next by thread: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- Index(es):
 |