On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 06:05:07PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Agree. I don't know why we are arguing the merrits of this, it's an
> obvious win. The problem is more if it's doable this way or not due to
> fragmentation, but that's a different discussion and should be kept
> seperate.
Btw, another bit I really like about the patches is that it make
the page cache size notation actually useful. People used PAGE_SIZE
and PAGE_CACHE_SIZE totally interchangeable before and created a total
mess. Getting rid of PAGE_CACHE_SIZE and only use the per-mapping
macros would be a nice cleanup all by iself even without putting the
rest in for now.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]