> Preventive measures are taken to limit only one continuation inode per > file per chunk. This can be done easily in the chunk allocation > algorithm for disk space. Although I'm not quite sure what you mean by How are you handling the allocation in this situation, are you assuming that a chunk is "out of bounds" because part of a file already lives on it or simply keeping a single inode per chunk which has multiple sparse pieces of the file on it ? ie if I write 0-8MB to chunk A and then 8-16 to chunk B can I write 16-24MB to chunk A producing a single inode of 0-8 16-24, or does it have to find another chunk to use ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck
- From: Amit Gud <gud@ksu.edu>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck
- From: Amit Gud <gud@cis.ksu.edu>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck
- From: Nikita Danilov <nikita@clusterfs.com>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck
- From: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck
- From: Nikita Danilov <nikita@clusterfs.com>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck
- From: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck
- From: Nikita Danilov <nikita@clusterfs.com>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck
- From: Valerie Henson <val_henson@linux.intel.com>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck
- From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck
- From: Amit Gud <gud@ksu.edu>
- [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck
- Prev by Date: Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- Next by Date: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck
- Index(es):
![]() |