On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Rik van Riel wrote:
William Heimbigner wrote:
However, is the code really in such a shape that the community doesn't
want to maintain it? Obviously there's a significant number of people
interested in reiser4 - if there weren't, questions like this wouldn't
keep getting asked.
There are people interested in using it, yes.
However, nobody appears to have stepped up to maintain the code.
If somebody really wanted to maintain the code, there would be a
new maintainer already.
On that note, what exactly is wanted for (assuming there was a maintainer)
reiser4 to be suitable for inclusion in the kernel? To my knowledge (and
I'll admit, I haven't looked in to it very far) the primary reason for
rejection was that it broke coding standards.
If there was 1) a maintainer and 2) code that didn't break "coding
standards", would it be included in the kernel?
William Heimbigner
[email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
