Re: [patch] convert aio event reap to use atomic-op instead of spin_lock

> >I have mixed feelings.  I think the userspace getevents support was
> >poorly designed and the simple fact that we've gone this long without it
> >says just how desperately the feature isn't needed.
> 
> I kept on getting requests from application developers who want that
> feature.  My initial patch was dated back May 2004.

My point is that demand for it doesn't seem to be very high, and your
use of the past tense there seems to support that.  And the patches to
support it are not looking great.

Is it worth it, then?  What difference are you measuring so far?

- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch] convert aio event reap to use atomic-op instead of spin_lock
    • From: [email protected] (Ken Chen)
  • Re: [patch] convert aio event reap to use atomic-op instead of spin_lock
    • From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] convert aio event reap to use atomic-op instead of spin_lock
    • From: "Ken Chen" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] convert aio event reap to use atomic-op instead of spin_lock
• Next by Date: Re: tmpfs and the OOM killer
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] convert aio event reap to use atomic-op instead of spin_lock
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] convert aio event reap to use atomic-op instead of spin_lock
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]