Re: If not readdir() then what?

[Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>]

On Apr 10 2007 10:37, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>
>NFS, OTOH, simply could not work without that requirement, since there
>exists no file pointer to tell you where you are in a stream beyond
>whatever the server manages to encode inside the opaque cookie+verifier.
>
>> But the fact of the matter is that if NFS protocols demands that a
>> per-directory entry cookie can be uniquely and permanently (including
>> across server reboots) identified with a small integer number, it's
>> dreaming.  Filesystem authors will cheat one way or another, because
>> there's nothing else for them to do.  
>
>Few people in the NFS community would disagree that the design of
>READDIR sucks (personally, I consider it to be one of the biggest
>scalability issues we have).
>The problem is that it is extremely hard to come up with an alternative
>that doesn't impose new conditions on what filesystems you can support.

I had a thought, but I think it's not quite ripe..

NFS server sends the whole directory contents on NFS client opendir,
so that the whole readdir/telldir/seekdir magic can happen on the
client only... which would perhaps also enable a cheap telldir/seekdir,
and would also give a 'fixed view' when adding/deleting files
during readdir.


Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/