On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 18:34 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Apr 9 2007 10:03, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>
> >In practice, though, this sort of behaviour has to be managed carefully
> >by the server. Forcing a client to re-read the entire contents of the
> >directory doesn't really scale too well...
>
> What does the spec (readdir, and NFS READDIR) say about duplicate entries,
> and what's done in practice?
> Actually, I'd be more concerned about code that does
>
> while(d = readdir(...))
> append_a_line_to(d);
>
> (which would be not-so-good on duplicate entries), rather than
> bad scaling.
>From SuSv3:
If a file is removed from or added to the directory after the
most recent call to opendir() or rewinddir(), whether a
subsequent call to readdir() returns an entry for that file is
unspecified.
For NFS, the results in the above case would be governed by the caching
rules: the client is not strictly required to revalidate the cache
except on opendir(). However if the client itself is the one changing
the directory, it will in practice cause the cache to be invalidated,
and the directory contents to be read in again from scratch.
Cheers
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
