On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Paul Jackson wrote: > It might look clearer to someone who is focused on that particular > change, but it adds unnecessary noise for the other 90% of the readers > of that code who are not concerned with cpusets at that point in time. This is in NUMA specific code. And they should be concerned about cpusets since cpusets may affect the node masks they can set. If this is hidden in a macro then it may be overlooked. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- 2.6.20-rc4-mm1
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'mems_allowed' (was: Re: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1)
- From: Sander <[email protected]>
- Re: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'mems_allowed' (was: Re: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1)
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'mems_allowed' (was: Re: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1)
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'mems_allowed' (was: Re: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1)
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'mems_allowed' (was: Re: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1)
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'mems_allowed' (was: Re: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1)
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- 2.6.20-rc4-mm1
- Prev by Date: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH -- RFC]Add notification for active Cell SPU tasks -- update #2
- Next by Date: Disk Cache, Was: O_DIRECT question
- Previous by thread: Re: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'mems_allowed' (was: Re: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1)
- Next by thread: Re: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'mems_allowed' (was: Re: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1)
- Index(es):
 |