Re: strncpy optimalisation? (lib/string.c)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > This one (tested in test-code seperate from kernel) works:
> No it doesn't!
> strncpy() guarantees that the entire destination buffer is written to.
> If you call
> 	strncpy(dest, "foo", 10000)
> then you MUST write to 10000 bytes of memory, or your strncpy() is buggy.
> Your patches basically turn strncpy() into strlcpy().  Don't do that.
> They're separate functions for a reason.

Yes I saw that, didn't read your e-mail before I read Willy's message.

Can you please also have a look at my strlcpy patch?


Folkert van Heusden

-- 
www.vanheusden.com/recoverdm/ - got an unreadable cd with scratches?
                            recoverdm might help you recovering data
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE, www.vanheusden.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux