strncpy optimalisation? (lib/string.c)

[Folkert van Heusden <folkert@vanheusden.com>]

Hi,

In lib/string.c we have:

char *strncpy(char *dest, const char *src, size_t count)
{
        char *tmp = dest;

        while (count) {
                if ((*tmp = *src) != 0)
                        src++;
                tmp++;
                count--;
        }
        return dest;
}

now I wonder isn't this ineffecient when strlen(src) < count? It would
then, if I'm correct, iterate count-strlen(src) times doing useless
increment/decrement. And since there are aprox. 580 instances in the
2.6.18.2 source, maybe some efficency can be won here.
Wouldn't it be better to do:
                if ((*tmp = *src) == 0x00)
                        break;

So that would be:
--- lib/string.c	2006-11-04 02:33:58.000000000 +0100
+++ string-new.c	2006-12-10 21:50:05.000000000 +0100
@@ -97,8 +97,8 @@
 	char *tmp = dest;
 
 	while (count) {
-		if ((*tmp = *src) != 0)
-			src++;
+		if ((*tmp = *src) == 0x00)
+			break;
 		tmp++;
 		count--;
 	}


Folkert van Heusden

-- 
www.vanheusden.com/multitail - win een vlaai van multivlaai! zorg
ervoor dat multitail opgenomen wordt in Fedora Core, AIX, Solaris of
HP/UX en win een vlaai naar keuze
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE, www.vanheusden.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/