Russell King <[email protected]> wrote:
> > You've now got four copies of struct timer_list, but only one handler.
>
> <re-insert last paragraph of my message until read, understood and
> actioned.>
I was merely correcting your assumption of what premise I was thinking of.
You thought of something unnecessarily complex. I said nothing about what I
thought of your last suggestion. Timer reduction patches are being worked on,
though not by me.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]