Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety

[David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>]

Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> I assume you wanted to delete "data" ?

Yes.

> Your premise is two timer_lists which use one common handler.
> 
> 	struct foo {
> 		struct timer_list timer1;
> 		strucr timer_list timer2;
> 	};

That's not what I was thinking of.  I was thinking of something much simpler:

	struct foo {
		struct timer_list timer;
	};


	...
		struct foo *a = kmalloc(sizeof(struct foo), GFP_KERNEL);
		a->timer.fn = do_foo_timer;
	...
		struct foo *b = kmalloc(sizeof(struct foo), GFP_KERNEL);
		b->timer.fn = do_foo_timer;
	...
		struct foo *c = kmalloc(sizeof(struct foo), GFP_KERNEL);
		c->timer.fn = do_foo_timer;
	...
		struct foo *d = kmalloc(sizeof(struct foo), GFP_KERNEL);
		d->timer.fn = do_foo_timer;
	...

You've now got four copies of struct timer_list, but only one handler.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/