> The right thing would have been to no put in gfs2 too early. According > to you it's unstable. I would note that Russell is expressing his own slightly odd view not a company one, nor afaik the view of any of the mainstream GFS2 team. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [GFS2] Change argument of gfs2_dinode_out [17/70]
- From: Steven Whitehouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [GFS2] Change argument of gfs2_dinode_out [17/70]
- From: Russell Cattelan <[email protected]>
- Re: [GFS2] Change argument of gfs2_dinode_out [17/70]
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [Cluster-devel] Re: [GFS2] Change argument of gfs2_dinode_out [17/70]
- From: Russell Cattelan <[email protected]>
- Re: [Cluster-devel] Re: [GFS2] Change argument of gfs2_dinode_out [17/70]
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [Cluster-devel] Re: [GFS2] Change argument of gfs2_dinode_out [17/70]
- From: Russell Cattelan <[email protected]>
- Re: [Cluster-devel] Re: [GFS2] Change argument of gfs2_dinode_out [17/70]
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [Cluster-devel] Re: [GFS2] Change argument of gfs2_dinode_out [17/70]
- From: Russell Cattelan <[email protected]>
- Re: [Cluster-devel] Re: [GFS2] Change argument of gfs2_dinode_out [17/70]
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- [GFS2] Change argument of gfs2_dinode_out [17/70]
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.19-git3 panics on boot - ata_piix/PCI related
- Next by Date: Device naming randomness (udev?)
- Previous by thread: Re: [Cluster-devel] Re: [GFS2] Change argument of gfs2_dinode_out [17/70]
- Next by thread: Re: [Cluster-devel] Re: [GFS2] Change argument of gfs2_dinode_out [17/70]
- Index(es):
 |