On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 01:19:04PM -0600, Russell Cattelan wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 12:15 +0000, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > >From 539e5d6b7ae8612c0393fe940d2da5b591318d3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Steven Whitehouse <[email protected]>
> > Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:07:05 -0500
> > Subject: [PATCH] [GFS2] Change argument of gfs2_dinode_out
> >
> > Everywhere this was called, a struct gfs2_inode was available,
> > but despite that, it was always called with a struct gfs2_dinode
> > as an argument. By making this change it paves the way to start
> > eliminating fields duplicated between the kernel's struct inode
> > and the struct gfs2_dinode.
> More pointless code churn.
>
> This only makes sense once the file system is working
> and we have time to do this type of cleanup on against
> a stable and TESTED code base.
Bzzert. Cleaner code is easier to _get_ stable. "Keep it ucking fugly
until everyone stops looking at it out of sheer disgust" is a bad idea.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
