El Sat, 2 Dec 2006 21:42:13 +0000, Alan <[email protected]> escribió: > I disagree. They can be very useful for tracking people down, and also If their mission is to be useful, they should at least have a "[email protected] (broken address)" warning. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- RE: [2.6 patch] Tigran Aivazian: remove bouncing email addresses
- From: "Hua Zhong" <[email protected]>
- RE: [2.6 patch] Tigran Aivazian: remove bouncing email addresses
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] Tigran Aivazian: remove bouncing email addresses
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] Tigran Aivazian: remove bouncing email addresses
- From: Tigran Aivazian <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] Tigran Aivazian: remove bouncing email addresses
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] Tigran Aivazian: remove bouncing email addresses
- From: Alan <[email protected]>
- RE: [2.6 patch] Tigran Aivazian: remove bouncing email addresses
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ensure i_ino uniqueness in filesystems without permanent inode numbers (via idr)
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
- Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] Tigran Aivazian: remove bouncing email addresses
- Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] Tigran Aivazian: remove bouncing email addresses
- Index(es):
 |