Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND

Hi!

> > > > Sane people use suspend-to-ram, and that's when you need the suspend and 
> > > > resume debugging.
> > > 
> > > Here I am wishing I had the _opportunity_ to be sane.  With my ATI X850
> > > AGP card, I have no choices except swsusp or reboot.
> > 
> > Have you tried s2ram (http://en.opensuse.org/S2ram)?
> 
> Cool.  That shows potential.  On an 2.6.19-rc6-rt4 kernel, it looked
> like it _might_ have eventually gotten past boot.  At one line of kernel
> output every ~10 seconds though, I gave up.  Virgin 2.6.19-rc6 went
> panic with a black screen... have options, will tinker.

Try that -rt kernel, but turn off dyntick/hires timers. Also try
hitting keyboard while resuming.

-- 
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Kill dma_is_consistent()
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]