On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > When doing 'make oldconfig' we should ask about suspend/resume > debug features when SOFTWARE_SUSPEND is not enabled. That's wrong. I never use SOFTWARE_SUSPEND, and I think the whole concept is totally broken. Sane people use suspend-to-ram, and that's when you need the suspend and resume debugging. Software-suspend is silly. I want my machine back in three seconds, not waiting for minutes.. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
- From: Christer Weinigel <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
- References:
- [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
- Prev by Date: Re: uml fails to compile due to missing offsetof
- Next by Date: Re: Sluggish system responsiveness on I/O
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
- Index(es):
 |