Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND

On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 09:33 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> >
> > When doing 'make oldconfig' we should ask about suspend/resume
> > debug features when SOFTWARE_SUSPEND is not enabled.
> 
> That's wrong.
> 
> I never use SOFTWARE_SUSPEND, and I think the whole concept is totally 
> broken.
> 
> Sane people use suspend-to-ram, and that's when you need the suspend and 
> resume debugging.

Here I am wishing I had the _opportunity_ to be sane.  With my ATI X850
AGP card, I have no choices except swsusp or reboot.

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
  - From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
  - From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
Next by Date: [PATCH] KVM: Expose MSRs to userspace (v2)
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
Next by thread: Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]