Nick wrote:
> IOW, how could a user possibly notice or care that partitions are
> being used to implement a given policy? (apart from the fact that
> the balancing will work better).
Tasks in higher up cpusets (e.g., the top cpuset) wouldn't load balance
across these partitions.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC] cpuset: add interface to isolated cpus
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset: add interface to isolated cpus
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset: add interface to isolated cpus
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset: add interface to isolated cpus
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset: add interface to isolated cpus
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset: add interface to isolated cpus
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset: add interface to isolated cpus
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset: add interface to isolated cpus
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset: add interface to isolated cpus
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- [RFC] cpuset: add interface to isolated cpus
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] cpuset: add interface to isolated cpus
- Next by Date: [PATCH] add-process_session-...-fix-warnings.patch fix
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] cpuset: add interface to isolated cpus
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] cpuset: add interface to isolated cpus
- Index(es):
 |