> > So ... where should it be done?
>
> sched.c I suppose.
Are we discussing where the implementing code should go,
or where the isolated cpu map special file should be
exposed to user space?
And you didn't answer my other questions, such as:
1) If your other patch to manipulate sched domains
has code that belongs in kernel/cpuset.c, and
special files that belong in /dev/cpuset, why
shouldn't this one naturally go in the same places?
2) Why ... why? What would be better about sched.c
and what's wrong with where it is (the code and
the exposed file)?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
