Re: [RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions? [KORG]

On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 01:16:20PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
> My other preferred alternative way, used by
> many programs like apache, postgresql, mysql,
> samba etc. is html, which could be read even 
> on consoles with lynx or links. 
> 
> If there is a problem of space let it be
> accessible in ftp subdirectory at least.

By the way, I wonder why current versions of
Documentation/DocBook in html are not accessible
from www.kernel.org? 

Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions? [KORG]
  - From: Glenn Enright <[email protected]>

References:
- [RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions?
  - From: Jarek Poplawski <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions?
  - From: Glenn Enright <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions?
  - From: Jarek Poplawski <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions?
  - From: Glenn Enright <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions?
  - From: Jarek Poplawski <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc2] [REVISED 2] drivers/media/video/se401.c: check kmalloc() return value.
Next by Date: 2.6.19-rc1, timebomb?
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions?
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions? [KORG]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]