[RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions?

Is it really so superfluous to have a possibility of 
reading all docs from Documentation on a lean box
(e.g. server) without all those xml, flex etc.
printers' toys installed?

Jarek P. 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions?
  - From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Undeprecate the sysctl system call
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.19-rc1: Fix build breakage with CONFIG_PPC32
Previous by thread: [RT-Tester Question]: rt-tester always says Pass no matter the kernel supports RT or not
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]