Re: [RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 19 October 2006 23:09, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> I'm sorry if I implied... It is not a problem of limited resources.
> If I can choose I allways tend to install only necessary software.
I suppose that certainly helps when chasing bugs. Did you have an 
alternative way of building the docs in mind that could be lighter? I 
admit the tree you described does seem a large pull just so you can 
read some text for one source package... even if it is the kernel.

> Thanks for your 2c (they are rarity here!),
You're welcome 

-- 
Please don't CC messages to me from mailing lists.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux