Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Nick Piggin wrote:
wake_priority_sleeper should not be called from rebalance_tick. That
code was OK where it was before, I think.
wake_priority_sleeper() is necessary to establish the idle state.
No it isn't. It's just that if it returns nonzero, we know we are not
idle so we needn't test for that again.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
