Christoph Lameter wrote:
scheduler_tick() has the potential of running for some time if f.e.
sched_domains for a system with 1024 processors have to be balanced.
We currently do all of that with interrupts disabled. So we may be unable
to service interrupts for some time.
I wonder if it would be possible to put the sched_tick() into a tasklet and
allow interrupts to be enabled? Preemption is still disabled and so we
are stuck on a cpu.
I don't think so because it also does accounting which probably wants to
be precisely on a tick.
Also the timeslice accounting takes the rq lock without disabling interrupt,
and task wakeups can easily happen from interrupt / softirq.
Taking rebalance_tick out of scheduler_tick, and not calling rebalance_tick
from sched_fork is probably a good idea.
After that, it might be acceptable to call rebalance_tick from a tasklet,
although it would be uneeded overhead on small systems. It might be better
to have a special case for your large systems which does the full balance
and runs less frequently in a tasklet (and make your regular rebalance_tick
skip the top level balancing).
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
