Re: [RFC] sched_tick with interrupts enabled

On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Nick Piggin wrote:

> wake_priority_sleeper should not be called from rebalance_tick. That
> code was OK where it was before, I think.

wake_priority_sleeper() is necessary to establish the idle state.

> And you need to now turn off interrupts when doing the locking in
> load_balance.

Hmmm.. yes requires to review all the locks. sigh.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC] sched_tick with interrupts enabled
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC] sched_tick with interrupts enabled
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] sched_tick with interrupts enabled
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] sched_tick with interrupts enabled
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] sched_tick with interrupts enabled
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] OOM killer meets userspace headers
• Next by Date: [PATCH] lockdep: fix ide/proc interaction
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] sched_tick with interrupts enabled
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] sched_tick with interrupts enabled
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]