Re: dealing with excessive includes

On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 06:15:27PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> So how about:
> 
> static inline void lock_super(struct super_block *sb)

Please start again at the top of the thread.  Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC] typechecking for get_unaligned/put_unaligned
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] typechecking for get_unaligned/put_unaligned
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] typechecking for get_unaligned/put_unaligned
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] typechecking for get_unaligned/put_unaligned
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • dealing with excessive includes
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: dealing with excessive includes
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
  • Re: dealing with excessive includes
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: dealing with excessive includes
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: dealing with excessive includes
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Block on access to temporarily unavailable pci device
• Next by Date: Re: veth crash (commit 751ae21c6cd1493e3d0a4935b08fb298b9d89773)
• Previous by thread: Re: dealing with excessive includes
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] typechecking for get_unaligned/put_unaligned
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]