Re: Would SSI clustering extensions be of interest to kernel community?

Ar Llu, 2006-10-16 am 14:49 +0200, ysgrifennodd Constantine Gavrilov:
> 2) Are kernel maintainers interested in clustering extensions to Linux 
> kernel? Do they see any value in them? (Our code does not require kernel 
> changes, but we are willing to submit it for inclusion if there is 
> interest.)

If they are doing SSI well and do not need core kernel changes then yes
they sound very interesting to me. Historically the big concern has
always been that things like this muck up the kernel core which affects
the other 99.99999% of users who don't want SSI clustering.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Would SSI clustering extensions be of interest to kernelcommunity?
    • From: Constantine Gavrilov <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Would SSI clustering extensions be of interest to kernel community?
    • From: Constantine Gavrilov <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/serial/dz.c: Remove save_flags()/cli()/restore_flags()
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] FRV: Use the correct preemption primitives in kmap_atomic() and co [try #2]
• Previous by thread: Would SSI clustering extensions be of interest to kernel community?
• Next by thread: Re: Would SSI clustering extensions be of interest to kernelcommunity?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]