11 Eki 2006 Çar 22:00 tarihinde, Pallipadi, Venkatesh şunları yazmıştı: > Can you configure with CPU_FREQ_DEBUG and do "echo 5 > > /sys/module/cpufreq/parameter/debug" before switching the governor to > ondemand and see whether you see any messages in dmesg? Here it is (sorry for prev. uncomplete mail); zangetsu cpufreq # echo 5 > /sys/module/cpufreq/parameters/debug zangetsu cpufreq # echo "ondemand" > scaling_governor zangetsu cpufreq # dmesg ... cpufreq-core: setting new policy for CPU 0: 800000 - 1733000 kHz freq-table: request for verification of policy (800000 - 1733000 kHz) for cpu 0 freq-table: verification lead to (800000 - 1733000 kHz) for cpu 0 freq-table: request for verification of policy (800000 - 1733000 kHz) for cpu 0 freq-table: verification lead to (800000 - 1733000 kHz) for cpu 0 cpufreq-core: new min and max freqs are 800000 - 1733000 kHz cpufreq-core: governor switch cpufreq-core: __cpufreq_governor for CPU 0, event 2 cpufreq-core: __cpufreq_governor for CPU 0, event 1 cpufreq-core: governor: change or update limits cpufreq-core: __cpufreq_governor for CPU 0, event 3 cpufreq-core: target for CPU 0: 1510185 kHz, relation 0 freq-table: request for target 1510185 kHz (relation: 0) for cpu 0 freq-table: target is 0 (1733000 kHz, 3369) cpufreq-core: target for CPU 0: 1609214 kHz, relation 0 freq-table: request for target 1609214 kHz (relation: 0) for cpu 0 freq-table: target is 0 (1733000 kHz, 3369) cpufreq-core: target for CPU 0: 1633971 kHz, relation 0 freq-table: request for target 1633971 kHz (relation: 0) for cpu 0 freq-table: target is 0 (1733000 kHz, 3369) cpufreq-core: target for CPU 0: 1559700 kHz, relation 0 freq-table: request for target 1559700 kHz (relation: 0) for cpu 0 freq-table: target is 0 (1733000 kHz, 3369) Cheers -- S.Çağlar Onur <caglar@pardus.org.tr> http://cekirdek.pardus.org.tr/~caglar/ Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates and an Apache in house!
Attachment:
pgp4lqLy1r28V.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- RE: Ondemand/Conservative not working with 2.6.18
- From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
- RE: Ondemand/Conservative not working with 2.6.18
- Prev by Date: Re: The Future of ReiserFS development
- Next by Date: funny looking equation
- Previous by thread: Re: Ondemand/Conservative not working with 2.6.18
- Next by thread: Re: Ondemand/Conservative not working with 2.6.18
- Index(es):