Le mardi 10 octobre 2006 à 14:49 -0700, Linus Torvalds a écrit : > > On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Maybe you can just create a patch that modifies ACPI not to mask the > > SCI bit? Reverting big chunk of ACPI code is likely not the right > > solution. > > I'm going to apply this after I've confirmed that it fixes the Mac Mini. I was about to send a patch doing exactly the same. It fixes the issue for me. Thanks. Fred. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.18 suspend regression on Intel Macs
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18 suspend regression on Intel Macs
- References:
- 2.6.18 suspend regression on Intel Macs
- From: Frédéric Riss <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18 suspend regression on Intel Macs
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18 suspend regression on Intel Macs
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18 suspend regression on Intel Macs
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18 suspend regression on Intel Macs
- From: Frédéric Riss <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18 suspend regression on Intel Macs
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18 suspend regression on Intel Macs
- From: Frédéric Riss <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18 suspend regression on Intel Macs
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18 suspend regression on Intel Macs
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- 2.6.18 suspend regression on Intel Macs
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] dccp __user annotations
- Next by Date: Re: BUG in filp_close() (was: Re: 2.6.19-rc1-mm1)
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.18 suspend regression on Intel Macs
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.18 suspend regression on Intel Macs
- Index(es):