Re: 2.6.18 suspend regression on Intel Macs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le mardi 10 octobre 2006 à 08:33 -0700, Linus Torvalds a écrit :
> > If we do this we probably should at least key this of some DMI
> > identification for the mac mini..
> 
> No. That would be silly.
> 
> Having _conditional_ code is not only bigger, it's orders of magnitude 
> more complex and likely to break. It's much better to say: "We know at 
> least one machine needs this" than it is to say "We know machine X needs 
> this", because the latter has extra complexity that just doesn't buy you 
> anything.
> 
> It's much better to treat everybody the same, if that works. That way, you 
> don't have different code-paths.

So what's the plan? Should/Will the ACPI guys remove the bit-preserving
change brought in with the latest ACPICA merge?

Fred.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux