Re: [patch] honour MNT_NOEXEC for access()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stas Sergeev wrote:
> Now, as the access(X_OK) is fixed, would it be
> feasible for ld.so to start using it?

Just must be kidding.  No access control can be reliably implemented at
userlevel.  There is no point starting something as stupid as this.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux